Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Portage
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
1,877
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,172)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Arrests for Driving Under the Influence
County: Portage Number of Arrests for Driving Under the Influence
268
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(233)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Child Maltreatment Calls Made
County: Portage Number of Child Maltreatment Calls Made
872
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(864)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Child Maltreatment Investigations Completed
County: Portage Number of Child Maltreatment Investigations Completed
291
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(326)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Child Maltreatment Reports
County: Portage Number of Child Maltreatment Reports
375
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(423)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Cleared Property Crimes
County: Portage Number of Cleared Property Crimes
240
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(247)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Domestic Abuse Arrests
County: Portage Number of Domestic Abuse Arrests
148
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(103)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Number of Domestic Abuse Victims
County: Portage Number of Domestic Abuse Victims
178
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(126)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
5,445
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6,350)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Disorderly Conduct Arrests
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Disorderly Conduct Arrests
34
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(36)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Drug and Liquor Arrests Combined
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Drug and Liquor Arrests Combined
41
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(33)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Drug Crime Arrests
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Drug Crime Arrests
16
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(19)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Liquor Law Arrests
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Liquor Law Arrests
16
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(19)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
101
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(103)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Property Crime Arrests
County: Portage Number of Juvenile Property Crime Arrests
67
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(67)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
308
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(237)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
267
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(329)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Property Crimes Arrests
County: Portage Number of Property Crimes Arrests
434
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(427)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
76
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(82)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Violent Crime Offenses in Portage County
County: Portage Number of Violent Crime Offenses in Portage County
58
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(67)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Child Maltreatment Referrals that are Screened-In
County: Portage Percent of Child Maltreatment Referrals that are Screened-In
34.0%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
11.0%
Percent %
(2012-2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were AODA Offenses
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were AODA Offenses
12.0%
Percent %
(2012-2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Bomb Threats
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Bomb Threats
1.0%
Percent %
(2012-2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Disorderly Conduct
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Disorderly Conduct
28.0%
Percent %
(2012-2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Property Offenses
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Property Offenses
35.0%
Percent %
(2012-2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(42.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Sexual Offenses
County: Portage Percent of Delinquency Referrals that were Sexual Offenses
9.0%
Percent %
(2012-2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
2.0%
Percent %
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
51.0%
Percent %
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(61.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
26.0%
Percent %
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
18.0%
Percent %
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Pounds of Methamphetamine Seized
County: Portage Pounds of Methamphetamine Seized
2,572
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2,643)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Property Crime Clearance Rates
County: Portage Property Crime Clearance Rates
43.0%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Property Crime Rate per 100,000 People
County: Portage Property Crime Rate per 100,000 People
1,300
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,426)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of All Sexual Offenses
County: Portage Rate of All Sexual Offenses
75.3
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(72.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Arrests for Drug Offenses Per 1,000 Persons
County: Portage Rate of Arrests for Drug Offenses Per 1,000 Persons
4
Per 1,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Arrests for DUI Per 1,000 Persons
County: Portage Rate of Arrests for DUI Per 1,000 Persons
4
Per 1,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests for Disorderly Conduct
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests for Disorderly Conduct
0.5%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests for Drug and Liquor Offenses
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests for Drug and Liquor Offenses
0.6%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests for Property Crimes
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests for Property Crimes
1.0%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
1.4%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests per 1,000 Persons
County: Portage Rate of Juvenile Arrests per 1,000 Persons
3
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Property Crime Arrests per 1000 Persons
County: Portage Rate of Property Crime Arrests per 1000 Persons
6
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of reported property crimes per 1000 persons
County: Portage Rate of reported property crimes per 1000 persons
9
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Reported Violent Crimes per 1,000
County: Portage Rate of Reported Violent Crimes per 1,000
1
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Violent Crime Arrests per 1,000 Persons
County: Portage Rate of Violent Crime Arrests per 1,000 Persons
1
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Reported Property Crimes
County: Portage Reported Property Crimes
633
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(629)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Sexual Assault Victim Services Contacts-CAP Services
County: Portage Sexual Assault Victim Services Contacts-CAP Services
644
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(561)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Total Number of Juvenile Arrests
County: Portage Total Number of Juvenile Arrests
211
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(196)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Violent Crime Clearance Rate Percentages
County: Portage Violent Crime Clearance Rate Percentages
95.0%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(76.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Violent Crime Rate
County: Portage Violent Crime Rate
156.3
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
WI Value
(289.6)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Prior Value
(155.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Violent Crime Rate per 100,000 People
County: Portage Violent Crime Rate per 100,000 People
92
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(101)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Portage All Parents in Family in Labor Force, Child 6-17 Years Old
County: Portage All Parents in Family in Labor Force, Child 6-17 Years Old
75.0%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage All Parents in Family in Labor Force, Child < 6 Years Old
County: Portage All Parents in Family in Labor Force, Child < 6 Years Old
72.0%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(73.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Average Household Size
County: Portage Average Household Size
2.30
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Value
(2.40)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
2,420
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2,708)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Family Households
County: Portage Family Households
17,454
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17,536)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Female Householder, no Husband Present, Family
County: Portage Female Householder, no Husband Present, Family
2,058
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2,052)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage FoodShare Expenditure (Dollar Amount) in Portage County
County: Portage FoodShare Expenditure (Dollar Amount) in Portage County
$17,911,270
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
($10,258,033)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Foreign Born Persons
County: Portage Foreign Born Persons
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Portage Households
County: Portage Households
29,311
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Households in Portage County
County: Portage Households in Portage County
29,193
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28,009)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Male Householder, No Wife Present, Family
County: Portage Male Householder, No Wife Present, Family
1,115
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,044)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Non-Family Households
County: Portage Non-Family Households
10,500
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10,439)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of 2-1-1 Housing Needs Calls
County: Portage Number of 2-1-1 Housing Needs Calls
313
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(379)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Number of Basic Needs Requests
County: Portage Number of Basic Needs Requests
2,484
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(808)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Homeless Students
County: Portage Number of Homeless Students
123
(2020-2021 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(146)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Individuals Sheltered at Family Crisis Center
County: Portage Number of Individuals Sheltered at Family Crisis Center
161
Individuals
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(169)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Individuals Sheltered at Hope Center
County: Portage Number of Individuals Sheltered at Hope Center
377
Individuals
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(310)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Individuals Sheltered at Stevens Point Warming Center
County: Portage Number of Individuals Sheltered at Stevens Point Warming Center
21
Individuals
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Unmet Needs Requests
County: Portage Number of Unmet Needs Requests
277
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(304)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Portage County Households Above ALICE Threshold
County: Portage Percent of Portage County Households Above ALICE Threshold
68.0%
Percent %
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Portage County Households at ALICE Threshold
County: Portage Percent of Portage County Households at ALICE Threshold
19.0%
Percent %
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Portage County Households Below Federal Poverty Level
County: Portage Percent of Portage County Households Below Federal Poverty Level
13.0%
Percent %
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Students Who are White
County: Portage Percent of Students Who are White
85.3%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(85.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Total Requests that were Basic Needs
County: Portage Percent of Total Requests that were Basic Needs
20.0%
Percent %
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Unmet Needs that were Basic Needs
County: Portage Percent of Unmet Needs that were Basic Needs
51.0%
Percent %
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Portage Population Over Age 65 (Count)
County: Portage Population Over Age 65 (Count)
12,274
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Portage County % Change in Population Age 65+ Since 2012
County: Portage Portage County % Change in Population Age 65+ Since 2012
15.0%
Percent %
(2014)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Portage County Population
County: Portage Portage County Population
70,468
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(70,822)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Total 2-1-1 Calls
County: Portage Total 2-1-1 Calls
3,617
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3,693)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Total Needs Requests
County: Portage Total Needs Requests
3,986
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4,160)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Total Sheltered Individuals
County: Portage Total Sheltered Individuals
432
Individuals
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(458)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Veteran Population
County: Portage Veteran Population
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage
Community / Public Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Portage Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions
County: Portage Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions
10.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Wisconsin counties.
WI Value
(10.9)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Prior Value
(9.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
County: Portage Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
48.5%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(35.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(45.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Billable Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Ambulance Run Volume
County: Portage Billable Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Ambulance Run Volume
3,299
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3,289)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Responses
County: Portage Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Responses
4,717
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4,521)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
71.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(53.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
72.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(72.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
20.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
5.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
8.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
22.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
1.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
1.0%
Percent %
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Total Emergency Medical Services runs by year
County: Portage Total Emergency Medical Services runs by year
3,644
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3,343)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage
Community / Social Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Portage Children in Single-Parent Households
County: Portage Children in Single-Parent Households
18.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage People 65+ Living Alone
County: Portage People 65+ Living Alone
26.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(29.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage People 65+ Living Alone (Count)
County: Portage People 65+ Living Alone (Count)
3,195
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Social Associations
County: Portage Social Associations
11.1
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Substantiated Child Abuse Rate
County: Portage Substantiated Child Abuse Rate
5.6
Cases per 1,000 children
(2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
WI Value
(3.2)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Children's Bureau
Prior Value
(9.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)
County: Portage
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Portage Households without a Vehicle
County: Portage Households without a Vehicle
4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Portage Mean Travel Time to Work
19.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(22.2)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Workers Driving 20+ Minutes to Work
County: Portage Percent of Workers Driving 20+ Minutes to Work
38.6%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(36.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Workers that Used a Car, Truck, or Van to Get to Work
County: Portage Percent of Workers that Used a Car, Truck, or Van to Get to Work
86.3%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(87.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
5.4%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Workers Walking 10+ Minutes to Work
County: Portage Percent of Workers Walking 10+ Minutes to Work
2.4%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Rate of Traffic Crashes per 1,000 Licensed Drivers
County: Portage Rate of Traffic Crashes per 1,000 Licensed Drivers
28
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
County: Portage Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
21.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Use of Public Transportation Services - City Bus Riders
County: Portage Use of Public Transportation Services - City Bus Riders
91,723
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(95,783)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Portage Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
WI Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Portage Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Portage Workers who Drive Alone to Work
75.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(77.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Workers who Walk to Work
County: Portage Workers who Walk to Work
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage
Economy / Employment
Value
Compared to:
County: Portage Employer Establishments
County: Portage Employer Establishments
1,699
Number of Establishments
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,682)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Portage Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
63.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
76.2%
Percent %
(2017)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(73.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Number of Children Under Age 6 with All Parents in the Workforce
County: Portage Number of Children Under Age 6 with All Parents in the Workforce
2,958
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3,059)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent Employed in Management, Business, Science, and Arts
County: Portage Percent Employed in Management, Business, Science, and Arts
31.7%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
8.7%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
16.1%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent Employed in Sales and Office Occupations
County: Portage Percent Employed in Sales and Office Occupations
25.8%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent Employed in Service Occupations
County: Portage Percent Employed in Service Occupations
17.8%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Percent of Workers that Worked at Home
County: Portage Percent of Workers that Worked at Home
7.0%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Portage Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
64.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(63.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Portage County Annual Unemployment Rates
County: Portage Portage County Annual Unemployment Rates
4.6%
Percent %
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Portage County Percent Change in Non-Farm Employment
County: Portage Portage County Percent Change in Non-Farm Employment
6.7%
Percent %
(2011-2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(-0.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
293
(2014)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(258)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Size of Labor Force
County: Portage Size of Labor Force
37,419
Persons
(August 2024)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(37,809)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Total Employment
County: Portage Total Employment
28,541
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(28,353)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Total Employment Change
County: Portage Total Employment Change
0.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(-5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Unemployed Veterans
County: Portage Unemployed Veterans
0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,128 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
County: Portage Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
2.7%
(August 2024)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage
Economy / Food Insecurity
Value
Compared to:
County: Portage Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: Portage Child Food Insecurity Rate
13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance
County: Portage Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance
38%
(2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(33%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(25% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Food Insecurity Rate
County: Portage Food Insecurity Rate
10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Food Share Recipients
County: Portage Food Share Recipients
8,685
Number of recipients
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8,842)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage FoodShare Recipients Served in Portage County
County: Portage FoodShare Recipients Served in Portage County
8,980
Recipients
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8,074)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Households Receiving SNAP with Children
County: Portage Households Receiving SNAP with Children
40.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
WI Value
(43.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)
County: Portage Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)
870
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Number of Approved Requests for Food by Emergency Services
County: Portage Number of Approved Requests for Food by Emergency Services
2,057
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3,579)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent Food Requests Approved Out of All Approved Requests
County: Portage Percent Food Requests Approved Out of All Approved Requests
45.2%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(50.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of Food Insecure Individuals
County: Portage Percent of Food Insecure Individuals
7.9%
Percent %
(2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of People Receiving FoodShare
County: Portage Percent of People Receiving FoodShare
12.7%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Percent of People Receiving WIC
County: Portage Percent of People Receiving WIC
1.9%
Percent %
(2018)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
36.6%
Percent %
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(33.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Portage Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: Portage Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(16.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Prior Value
(22.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Projected Food Insecurity Rate
County: Portage Projected Food Insecurity Rate
10.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Portage Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
County: Portage Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
30.1%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
WI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Wisconsin counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
WI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wisconsin State value.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
